Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
2.
Thorax ; 76(Suppl 2):A1, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1507054

ABSTRACT

T1 Figure 1ConclusionsOverall, this largest paediatric single cell COVID-19 study to date showed significant differences in response to SARS-CoV-2 between children and adults, reflecting the changes of the immune landscape over developmental time, which in children are dominated by naïve and innate responses.

3.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ; 203(9):1, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1407010
4.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ; 203(9), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1277160

ABSTRACT

Rationale: Patients with severe respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2 often require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Tracheostomy has been described in these patients, but data are limited regarding the outcomes of patients with SARS-CoV-2 who require tracheostomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 intubated at our tertiary care center from March to November 2020. We included those who had percutaneous tracheostomy for prolonged respiratory failure. We catalogued demographics and outcomes. Non-parametric data were compared using unpaired, two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. Results: We identified 50 patients with prolonged respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2 who had percutaneous tracheostomy. Median age was 65.5 (interquartile range, IQR 56 - 71) years, 64% were male, and median BMI was 28 (25 - 35). Median time to last follow-up was 61 (IQR 14 - 136) days, and 70% of patients were alive at last follow-up. Median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 19 (IQR 15 - 24) days. The majority of tube sizes were extended length Shiley size 6 (64%). Median time from tracheostomy to end of mechanical ventilation was 13 (IQR 8 - 20) days, and median time to decannulation was 24 (19 - 38) days. Seventeen patients (34%) were decannulated by hospital discharge, and 33 patients (66%) were decannulated by last follow-up;94% of survivors were decannulated by last follow-up. Two patients (4%) developed tracheal stenosis after decannulation. Patients who were decannulated were younger (56 (37 - 64) vs 69 (64 - 74) years, p<0.01). Providers involved in the tracheostomy procedures reported no SARS-CoV-2 infections amongst themselves. Conclusions: In this limited cohort of patients who had tracheostomy for prolonged respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2, there was a high rate of decannulation. The majority of patients were decannulated by last followup, and almost all survivors were decannulated. This appears to be a unique feature of SARS-CoV-2, as the incidence of decannulation for other types of ARDS are lower. Continued study is needed to understand the long-term outcomes of survivors of SARS-CoV-2. .

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL